- Count View : 23
- آدرس کوتاه شده مقاله: https://bahareadab.com/article_id/2053
- کد IranDOI مقاله: IranDOI :10.irandoi.2002/bahareadab.2026 .19 .8266
volume Number : 19
number In Volume : 6
issue Number : 124
Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 19،
number In Volume 6،
،
issue Number 124
Parallel Structures in Persian and English Translations of the Holy Quran: A Comparative Study of Juz’ 30 Based on Nigel Fabb’s Theory
Soheila Mohammad pour , Zahra Abolhasani Chimeh (Author in Charge), Mahnaz Karbalai Sadegh
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Parallel structures are among the major rhetorical devices in the Holy Qur’an, functioning at different linguistic levels to create cohesion, foreground meaning, and intensify the aesthetic effect of the text. The thirtieth part of the Qur’an, due to its brevity, structural compactness, and frequent patterns of repetition and symmetry, provides an appropriate corpus for examining this phenomenon. This study aims to investigate parallel structures in the thirtieth part of the Qur’an and to analyze how they are reflected in two Persian and English translations, namely those by Fooladvand and Arberry.
METHODOLOGY: The study adopts a descriptive-analytical approach and is based on library research. The data were extracted from the verses of the thirtieth part and classified according to Nigel Fabb’s theoretical framework, with its operational extension into four levels: syntactic, morphological-lexical, phonological, and discourse. Alongside the statistical analysis of the data, three surahs—Al-Nāziʿāt, Al-Takwīr, and Al-Nās—were selected as representative samples for a more detailed examination of parallel structures and their representation in the two translations.
FINDINGS: The findings indicate that parallel structures in the thirtieth part of the Qur’an constitute a systematic and multilayered phenomenon. They play a significant role in organizing the semantic relations of the verses, reinforcing textual cohesion, creating rhythm, and foregrounding central concepts. The analysis of the translations further shows that Fooladvand’s translation performs more prominently in representing syntactic relations, lexical continuity, and discourse cohesion, whereasArberry’s translation shows a statistically significant difference in recreating the phonological, rhythmic, and literary aspects of the original text.
CONCLUSION: The study concludes that parallel structures in the thirtieth part of the Qur’an are not merely rhetorical ornaments, but fundamental elements in shaping meaning, establishing cohesion, and guiding the audience’s reception. The comparison of the translations also suggests that transferring such structures in Qur’anic translation requires a balance between preserving form, conveying meaning, and recreating rhetorical effect. This balance varies according to the level of parallelism and the contextual function of each structure.
Keyword
Parallel structures"
, "Thirtieth part of the Holy Qur’an"
, "Qur’anic translation studies"
, "Fooladvand"
, "Arberry"
, "Qur’anic rhetoric
- Abdi, M. (2016). A critique of Fooladvand’s translation based on the morphological, syntactic, lexical, and rhetorical functions of semantics. Qur’an and Hadith Translation Studies, 2(3), 127–149.
- Abdul-Raof, H. (2001). Qur’an translation: Discourse, texture and exegesis. Curzon.
- Abdul-Raof, H. (2006). Qur’an translation: Discourse, texture and exegesis. Routledge. https://www.scribd.com/document/333683975/Hussein-Abdul-Raof-Qur-an-Translation-Discourse-Texture
- Abdurraheem, H. (2022). A stylistic study of antithetical parallelism in the Qur’ān. University of Chitral Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 6(2), 1–17.
- Al-Ameedi, R., & Mukhef, R. (2017). Aspects of political language and parallelism. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(34), 185–200.
- Al-Khawaldeh, N. (2017). The linguistic technique of parallelism in Al-Ahwas Al-Ansari’s poetry: A stylistic study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(1), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.7575/AIJALEL.V.6N.1P
- Al-Suyuti, I. (n.d.). Tafsir al-Qur’an: A complete English translation of classical Qur’anic commentaries (B. Abrahamson, Trans.; R. Abrahamson, Ed.). Al Sadiqin Institute. http://alsadiqin.org/tafsir
- Arberry, A. J. (1988). The Koran interpreted: A translation. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordislamicstudies.com/Public/book_tki.html
- Aziz, N. R. (2012). Parallelism as a cohesive device in English and Arabic prayers: A contrastive analysis [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Baghdad.
- Baker, M. (2011). In other words: A coursebook on translation (2nd ed.). Routledge.
- Berlin, A. (1985). The dynamics of biblical parallelism. Indiana University Press.
- Dhimal, M. A. T., & Timalsina, D. P. (2024). Syntactic parallelism in Muglan. [Journal name not provided], 3(1). [Pages not provided].
- Dror, Y. (2017). Grammatical parallelism in the Qurʼān. Archiv Orientalni, 86, 165–189.
- Fabb, N. (1997). Linguistics and literature: Language in the verbal arts of the world. Blackwell.
- Fabb, N. (2015). What is poetry? Language and memory in the poems of the world. Cambridge University Press.
- Falah, E., & Dehghani Neysiani, N. (2019). Discursive stylistics of passive structures: The thirtieth part of the Holy Qur’an. Siraj-e Monir, 10(36), 125–149.
- Fuladvand, M. M. (Trans.). (1997). The Holy Qur’an. Dar al-Qur’an al-Karim.
- Gray, G. B. (1951). The forms of Hebrew poetry: Considered with special reference to the criticism and interpretation of the Old Testament. KTAV Publishing House.
- Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
- Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 350–377). MIT Press.
- Kadhim, B., & Mahdi, S. (2018). Parallelism in selected short chapters of the Holy Quran: A stylistic analysis. The Islamic University College Journal, 2(50), 72–83.
- Khairunnisa, & Irfansyah. (2023). Parallelism of heaven in Al-Qur’an translation of Kemenag and Al-Kitab translation of Sabda. Jurnal Contemplate, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.53649/contemplate.v4i02.421
- Lowth, R. (1835). Lectures on the sacred poetry of the Hebrews (G. Gregory, Trans.). Crocker & Brewster. (Original work published 1753)
- Mir, M. (1986). Coherence in the Qur’an: A study of Islahi’s concept of nazm in Tadabbur-i Qur’an. American Trust Publications.
- Nazari, Y. (2025). A corpus-based study of identical phrases in the Holy Qur’an: An investigation of Fooladvand’s and Makarem Shirazi’s translations. Journal of the Iranian Association of Arabic Language and Literature, (75), 299–317.
- Ne’mati, H., Keykhaei, Y., & Fallahi, M. (2012). A stylistic analysis of the metrical translation of the 30th part of the Holy Qur’an composed by Omid Majd, based on the frequency of parallelism and deviation [Master’s thesis, University of Sistan and Baluchestan].
- Nwankwo, S. (2023, April). Parallelism in language study: As exemplified in students’ writing [Manuscript]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369693912
- Robinson, N. (2003). Discovering the Qur’an: A contemporary approach to a veiled text (2nd ed.). Georgetown University Press.
- Sarv, M. (2017). Towards a typology of parallelism in Estonian poetic folklore. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore, 67, [page range]. https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2017.67.sarv
- Sharifi-Moghadam, A., & Bordbar, A. (2011). A study of the manifestations of phonological, lexical, and syntactic parallelism in the 30th part of the Holy Qur’an. Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(7), 131–149.
- Turpin, M. (2017). Parallelism in Arandic song-poetry. Oral Tradition, 31(2), 535–560.