- Count View : 39
- Doi: 10.22034/bahareadab.2023 .16 .7044
Journal of the stylistic of Persian poem and prose
volume Number 16، number In Volume 7، ، issue Number 89
Interrogative rhetoric and indirect meanings of interrogative sentences in illustrations by Khosrow and Shirin of Nizami
Shirin Faramarzpour , Pooran Yousefipour Kermani (Author in Charge), Hamid Tabasi
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The figurative function of sentences and their secondary meanings is one of the topics discussed in the science of semantics, which is expressed in the form of a question, and considering the fact that interrogative sentences are considered essay sentences, the purpose of interrogatives is to obtain information and news. is. In most rhetorical books, thirty-two cases are considered as secondary objects for interrogative sentences. The aim of the research is to find out what concepts Nizami Ganjai intended to express through the use of rhetorical questions. METHODOLOGY: In this research, which was carried out using a descriptive-analytical method and a library tool, the secondary purposes of interrogative sentences in the poetry of Khosrow and Shirin Nizami were investigated and analyzed. FINDINGS: It should be mentioned that 446 rhetorical interrogatives are used in the poetry of Khosrow and Shirin. The use of this volume of rhetorical questions shows the richness of themes and concepts and the rhetorical value of Khosrow and Shirin. CONCLUSION: The results of the research indicate that most of the interrogative questions of Khosrow and Shirin contain the implicit meaning of helplessness and expression of despair, and Nizami in his poem has used all the linguistic tricks and abilities in the structure of the science of meanings well and has expressed his speech in such a way The art is decorated in such a way that the optimal use of the science of meanings has made the words of Khosrow and Shirin"s poem lasting and affecting.
science of meanings , questioning , secondary purposes , Khosrow and Shirin , illustration.
- Agha Hosseini, Hossein and Barati, Mahmoud. (2010). “The importance of questions in mystical texts”. Kavosh Nameh Journal, NO.22, pp.131-160.
- Hashemi, Ahmad. (2010). Javaher al-Balagheh, translated by Hassan Irfan, Qom: Balaghat.
- Homaei, Jalaluddin. (1996). Meanings and expressions, by the effort of Mahdekht Banoo Homaei, Tehran: Homa.
- Kazazi, Mirjalaluddin. (2007). Manani wa Bayan, Tehran: Mad book.
- Miranian, Ali. (2019). Examining the secondary meanings of interrogative sentences of the third and fourth books of Masnavi, master's thesis, Imam Khomeini International University.
- Mirhashmi, Seyedd Morteza et al. (2018). "Investigation of the role of rhetorical methods of persuasion in creating suspense in Khosrow and Shirin Nizami", biannual journal of Persian language and literature, No.89, pp.279-303.
- Mortazaei, Khadije & et al. (2018). "Research and analysis of two archetypes of anima and animus in the stories of Khosrow and Shirin and Laili and Majnoon", Scientific Quarterly of Tafsir and Analysis of Persian Language and Literature Texts (Dehkhoda), No52, pp.436-466.
- Nizami Ganjavi, Elias ibn Yusuf. (2000). Khosrow and Shirin, corrections and footnotes by Hasan Vahid Dastgardi, with the efforts of Saeed Hamedian, Tehran: Qatre.
- Rajaee, Mohammad Khalil. (2012). Ma’alem al-balaghe, Shiraz: Shiraz University.
- Rezanjad (Noshin), Abdul Hossein. (1989). Principles of Rhetoric in Persian Language, Qom: Al-Zahra.
- Safa, Zabihullah. (1985). History of Iranian Literature, Volume 3, Tehran: Asatir.
- Zanjani, Barat. (1999). Sovar khiyal in Khamse Nizami, Tehran: AmirKabir.